The Competitive Landscape

Not all corporate travel
platforms are equal.

Especially not in MENA. Every platform has a story — and a gap. Here's an honest look at who's in the market, and why BizAway is different.

vs. Navan

Great UX. Wrong market.

Navan (TripActions)
Built for Silicon Valley
Their strengths
Best-in-class UX Strong inventory Expense integration
Their gaps in MENA
USD pricing only No UAE office or team No Arabic support Trustpilot: 3.5/5
"What happens when your traveller is stranded at 2am in Riyadh and support doesn't answer?"
vs. SAP Concur

The enterprise default.
Everyone who uses it wants to leave.

SAP Concur
Expensive · Complex · Outdated
Their strengths
SAP ERP integration Brand recognition Enterprise compliance
What real users say
Poor UX — "feels like 2005" High platform licence fees 6–12 month implementation No 24/7 human support
"I could book multiple flights on Google Flights faster than one trip on Concur." — Verified G2 review
vs. dnata · Al Tayyar · Traditional TMCs

The local trust.
The legacy technology.

Regional TMCs (dnata, Al Tayyar, Kanoo)
Strong locally — limited tech
Their strengths
Deep local relationships Arabic-language support Emirates/flydubai access
Their gaps
Still email/WhatsApp booking No self-service platform No real-time spend data Opaque mark-up pricing
dnata is a trusted name. BizAway gives you dnata's local knowledge — plus the platform your team expects in 2026.
The Only Platform That Does All Four

BizAway occupies a white space.

Platform UX MENA presence 24/7 human Mid-market price
Navan✓✓✗✗~
SAP Concur✗✓✗✗
dnata✗✓✓✓✗
Amex GBT~✓✓✗
BizAway ✦✓✓✓✓
1 / 5
Why BizAway vs. The Others